[PATCH] ARM i.MX: Possible bug fixed due misspelling when copy/paste

[Alexander Shiyan]

We must check pointer to function rather than result.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work at mail.ru>
---
 arch/arm/mach-imx/speed-imx51.c |    4 ++--
 arch/arm/mach-imx/speed-imx53.c |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/speed-imx51.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/speed-imx51.c
index 84f4892..5a845a6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/speed-imx51.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/speed-imx51.c
@@ -98,9 +98,9 @@ static unsigned long get_rate_select(int select,
 {
 	switch (select) {
 	case 0:
-		return get_rate1() ? get_rate1() : 0;
+		return get_rate1 ? get_rate1() : 0;
 	case 1:
-		return get_rate2() ? get_rate2() : 0;
+		return get_rate2 ? get_rate2() : 0;
 	case 2:
 		return get_rate3 ? get_rate3() : 0;
 	case 3:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/speed-imx53.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/speed-imx53.c
index a2385fa..634341e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/speed-imx53.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/speed-imx53.c
@@ -103,9 +103,9 @@ static unsigned long get_rate_select(int select,
 {
 	switch (select) {
 	case 0:
-		return get_rate1() ? get_rate1() : 0;
+		return get_rate1 ? get_rate1() : 0;
 	case 1:
-		return get_rate2() ? get_rate2() : 0;
+		return get_rate2 ? get_rate2() : 0;
 	case 2:
 		return get_rate3 ? get_rate3() : 0;
 	case 3:
-- 
1.7.3.4