[PATCH 0/4] mxs: iomux configuration improvements

[esben.haabendal at gmail.com]

From: Esben Haabendal <esben.haabendal at gmail.com>

These patches completes the iomux configuration definitions in
iomux-imx28.h, fixes a bug for PWM3 pad configuration, and fixes
support for using BITKEEPER(1) in pad configurations.

RFC: It might be better to just get rid of the split between BITKEEPER
and PULLUP in definitions.  It clearly is a source for subtle bugs
(setting PULLUP does not really do anything if the pad/function is
actually defined as a keeper pad.  As for i.MX28 the reference manual
is not very clear on which pads/functions have pullup instead of
keeper, and I am not sure that the current defintions in barebox is in
sync with the manual and/or the real world.  What do you think, should
I make a patch unifying PULLUP and BITKEEPER.

Esben Haabendal (4):
  mxs: Fix support for BITKEEPER() macro
  mxs: Fix i.MX28 PWM3 iomux configuration
  mxs: Cleanup use of blank lines in i.MX28 iomux configurations
  mxs: Add remaining i.MX28 iomux configurations

 arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/iomux-imx28.h |  163 +++++++++++++++++++-------
 arch/arm/mach-mxs/iomux-imx.c                |    6 +
 2 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.5.4