[PATCH 10/12] ARM: add early malloc support needed by the decompressor

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 11:20 Mon 30 Jul     , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:04:43AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > > > > > >  	/* clear bss */
> > > > > > > >  	memset(__bss_start, 0, __bss_stop - __bss_start);
> > > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > > +	/* set 128 KiB before the STACK_BASE - 16 address for early malloc */
> > > > > > > > +	free_mem_ptr = STACK_BASE - 0x20000 - 16;
> > > > > > > > +	free_mem_end_ptr = STACK_BASE - 16;
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > This assumes that the malloc area is directly before the stack. How
> > > > > > > about using __bss_stop or _end instead?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > it's just for early alloc and __bss_stop no so maybe we can use the same as
> > > > > > Malloc but we already use this for HEAD_TEXT_BASE
> > > > > 
> > > > > _end is HEAD_TEXT_BASE + the space needed for the compressed
> > > > > image, so what's wrong with it?
> > > > the pbl image can be stored in a sram and link to fit there so _end could be
> > > > at the end of the sram
> > > > 
> > > > so we can not use it.
> > > > 
> > > > We need to put the early malloc in the sdram
> > > 
> > > HEAD_TEXT_BASE is in sdram, because it's the same as MALLOC_BASE, so
> > > _end by definition also is in sdram.
> > yes but pbl fill the sram fully so in my case I put HEAD_TEXT_BASE is sram not
> > sdram so no space for the MALLOC and MALLOC_BASE is in sdram
> 
> Ok, then the assumption that HEAD_TEXT_BASE is always in sdram is wrong.
> We can live with this until you add your at91 support. Nevertheless
> MALLOC_BASE always is in sdram, so I suggest to use the last 128k of the
> malloc space for early malloc:
> 
> free_mem_ptr = MALLOC_BASE + MALLOC_SIZE - SZ_128K
ok fine by me

I resend the full patch series

Best Regards,
J.