[PATCH] fs: fat: gen_numname() is only need with FS_FAT_WRITE

Wolfram Sang w.sang at pengutronix.de
Fri Jan 6 04:37:35 EST 2012


On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 09:29:18AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 08:18:15PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > So, check for that config option, too. This will get rid of the warning:
> > 
> > 	fs/fat/ff.c:878:13: warning: 'gen_numname' defined but not used
> > 
> > I could have also moved the function further down, but I decided for the
> > least intrusive change.
> 
> I already posted the same patch.

Ah, now I found it. Terrible patch description, if I may say so ;)

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/attachments/20120106/8b927514/attachment.sig>


More information about the barebox mailing list