[PATCH] fs: fat: gen_numname() is only need with FS_FAT_WRITE
Wolfram Sang
w.sang at pengutronix.de
Fri Jan 6 04:37:35 EST 2012
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 09:29:18AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 08:18:15PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > So, check for that config option, too. This will get rid of the warning:
> >
> > fs/fat/ff.c:878:13: warning: 'gen_numname' defined but not used
> >
> > I could have also moved the function further down, but I decided for the
> > least intrusive change.
>
> I already posted the same patch.
Ah, now I found it. Terrible patch description, if I may say so ;)
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/attachments/20120106/8b927514/attachment.sig>
More information about the barebox
mailing list