[PATCH 0/4] mxs: iomux configuration improvements

[Sascha Hauer]

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 07:29:03PM +0200, esben.haabendal at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Esben Haabendal <esben.haabendal at gmail.com>
> 
> These patches completes the iomux configuration definitions in
> iomux-imx28.h, fixes a bug for PWM3 pad configuration, and fixes
> support for using BITKEEPER(1) in pad configurations.
> 
> RFC: It might be better to just get rid of the split between BITKEEPER
> and PULLUP in definitions.  It clearly is a source for subtle bugs
> (setting PULLUP does not really do anything if the pad/function is
> actually defined as a keeper pad.  As for i.MX28 the reference manual
> is not very clear on which pads/functions have pullup instead of
> keeper, and I am not sure that the current defintions in barebox is in
> sync with the manual and/or the real world.  What do you think, should
> I make a patch unifying PULLUP and BITKEEPER.
> 
> Esben Haabendal (4):
>   mxs: Fix support for BITKEEPER() macro
>   mxs: Fix i.MX28 PWM3 iomux configuration
>   mxs: Cleanup use of blank lines in i.MX28 iomux configurations
>   mxs: Add remaining i.MX28 iomux configurations

Applied, thanks.

Sascha

> 
>  arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/iomux-imx28.h |  163 +++++++++++++++++++-------
>  arch/arm/mach-mxs/iomux-imx.c                |    6 +
>  2 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 1.7.5.4
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |