[PATCH 3/4] driver/memmap: fix generic_memmap_rw and generic_memmap_ro
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Thu Feb 10 02:12:25 EST 2011
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:31:59AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> we check before the RW access for generic_memmap_ro instead of
> generic_memmap_rw
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/driver.c | 5 +++--
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/driver.c b/drivers/base/driver.c
> index ff92e44..bd7464e 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/driver.c
> @@ -223,8 +223,6 @@ int generic_memmap_ro(struct cdev *cdev, void **map, int flags)
> if (!cdev->dev)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (flags & PROT_WRITE)
> - return -EACCES;
> *map = (void *)cdev->dev->map_base;
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -234,6 +232,9 @@ int generic_memmap_rw(struct cdev *cdev, void **map, int flags)
> if (!cdev->dev)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + if (flags & PROT_WRITE)
> + return -EACCES;
> +
So instead of allowing write access in the read/write function we now
allow it in the readonly function? I'm afraid I don't understand this.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list