[PATCH 1/2] serial_ns16550: move switch from ns16550_{read, write}() to ns16550_probe()
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Thu Aug 4 03:19:40 EDT 2011
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 10:37:45PM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov at gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/serial/serial_ns16550.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/serial/serial_ns16550.c b/drivers/serial/serial_ns16550.c
> index 4ed2671..ec93750 100644
> --- a/drivers/serial/serial_ns16550.c
> +++ b/drivers/serial/serial_ns16550.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,23 @@
>
> /*********** Private Functions **********************************/
>
> +#define NS16550_READ_WRITE_UART_FUNC(pfx, cmdr, cmdw, mask) \
> +static unsigned int ns16550_generic_##pfx##_read(unsigned long base, \
> + unsigned char reg_idx) \
> +{ \
> + return cmdr((char *)base + reg_idx); \
> +} \
> + \
> +static void ns16550_generic_##pfx##_write(unsigned int val, unsigned long base, \
> + unsigned char reg_idx) \
> +{ \
> + cmdw((mask val), (char *)base + reg_idx); \
> +}
> +
> +NS16550_READ_WRITE_UART_FUNC(8bit, readb, writeb, 0xff &)
> +NS16550_READ_WRITE_UART_FUNC(16bit, readw, writew, 0xffff &)
> +NS16550_READ_WRITE_UART_FUNC(32bit, readl, writel, )
Please don't do such preprocessor tricks if not necessary. we can afford
the 8 additional lines for making this readable.
> +
> /**
> * @brief read register
> *
> @@ -60,22 +77,10 @@ static uint32_t ns16550_read(struct console_device *cdev, uint32_t off)
> {
> struct device_d *dev = cdev->dev;
> struct NS16550_plat *plat = (struct NS16550_plat *)dev->platform_data;
> - int width = dev->resource[0].flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_TYPE_MASK;
>
> off <<= plat->shift;
>
> - if (plat->reg_read)
> - return plat->reg_read((unsigned long)dev->priv, off);
> -
> - switch (width) {
> - case IORESOURCE_MEM_8BIT:
> - return readb(dev->priv + off);
> - case IORESOURCE_MEM_16BIT:
> - return readw(dev->priv + off);
> - case IORESOURCE_MEM_32BIT:
> - return readl(dev->priv + off);
> - }
> - return -1;
> + return plat->reg_read((unsigned long)dev->priv, off);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -90,26 +95,10 @@ static void ns16550_write(struct console_device *cdev, uint32_t val,
> {
> struct device_d *dev = cdev->dev;
> struct NS16550_plat *plat = (struct NS16550_plat *)dev->platform_data;
> - int width = dev->resource[0].flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_TYPE_MASK;
>
> off <<= plat->shift;
>
> - if (plat->reg_write) {
> - plat->reg_write(val, (unsigned long)dev->priv, off);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - switch (width) {
> - case IORESOURCE_MEM_8BIT:
> - writeb(val & 0xff, dev->priv + off);
> - break;
> - case IORESOURCE_MEM_16BIT:
> - writew(val & 0xffff, dev->priv + off);
> - break;
> - case IORESOURCE_MEM_32BIT:
> - writel(val, dev->priv + off);
> - break;
> - }
> + plat->reg_write(val, (unsigned long)dev->priv, off);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -239,9 +228,41 @@ static int ns16550_probe(struct device_d *dev)
> /* we do expect platform specific data */
> if (plat == NULL)
> return -EINVAL;
> - if (!(dev->resource[0].flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_TYPE_MASK) &&
> - ((plat->reg_read == NULL) || (plat->reg_write == NULL)))
> - return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (plat->reg_read == NULL) {
> + int width = dev->resource[0].flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_TYPE_MASK;
> +
> + switch (width) {
> + default:
> + case IORESOURCE_MEM_8BIT:
> + plat->reg_read = ns16550_generic_8bit_read;
> + break;
> + case IORESOURCE_MEM_16BIT:
> + plat->reg_read = ns16550_generic_16bit_read;
> + break;
> + case IORESOURCE_MEM_32BIT:
> + plat->reg_read = ns16550_generic_32bit_read;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (plat->reg_write == NULL) {
> + int width = dev->resource[0].flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_TYPE_MASK;
> +
> + switch (width) {
> + default:
> + case IORESOURCE_MEM_8BIT:
> + plat->reg_write = ns16550_generic_8bit_write;
> + break;
> + case IORESOURCE_MEM_16BIT:
> + plat->reg_write = ns16550_generic_16bit_write;
> + break;
> + case IORESOURCE_MEM_32BIT:
> + plat->reg_write = ns16550_generic_32bit_write;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
Passing one of the register access function without the other shouldn't
be a valid usecase. Jean is right, there should be only one if().
Generally platform_data shouldn't be used after device probe and for
sure it shouldn't be modified. This may be the point where this driver
needs a private data struct.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list