[PATCH 2/6] at91: Introduction of at91sam9261 SOC.

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Thu Aug 19 11:42:18 EDT 2010


On 08:52 Thu 19 Aug     , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:48:26AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > AT91sam9261 series is an ARM 926ej-s SOC family clocked at 190/100MHz.
> > 
> > The first board that embeds at91sam9261 chip is the AT91SAM9261-EK.
> > http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/tools_card.asp?tool_id=3820
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/Makefile                                  |    1 +
> >  arch/arm/boards/at91sam9261ek/Makefile             |    1 +
> >  arch/arm/boards/at91sam9261ek/config.h             |  110 +++++++++
> >  arch/arm/boards/at91sam9261ek/env/bin/_update      |   36 +++
> >  arch/arm/boards/at91sam9261ek/env/bin/boot         |   47 ++++
> >  arch/arm/boards/at91sam9261ek/env/bin/hush_hack    |    1 +
> >  arch/arm/boards/at91sam9261ek/env/bin/init         |   38 +++
> >  .../at91sam9261ek/env/bin/update_barebox_xmodem    |   26 ++
> >  .../arm/boards/at91sam9261ek/env/bin/update_kernel |   15 ++
> >  arch/arm/boards/at91sam9261ek/env/bin/update_root  |   16 ++
> >  arch/arm/boards/at91sam9261ek/env/config           |   28 +++
> 
> Care to use the generic environment? What's missing in it for you to use
> it?
miss it in the code
> 
> >  arch/arm/boards/at91sam9261ek/init.c               |  170 ++++++++++++++
> >  arch/arm/configs/at91sam9261ek_defconfig           |  242 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig                         |   23 ++
> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile                        |    1 +
> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261.c                   |  230 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261_devices.c           |  169 ++++++++++++++
> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91sam9261.h      |  109 +++++++++
> 
> Can you please make two patches out of this? One for the architecture
> support and another one for the board support.
Personnaly I prefer to add the first board at the same as e do for the kernel
otherwise ok

Best Regards,
J.



More information about the barebox mailing list