Question about IMCFGLO timeouts workaround
zajec5 at gmail.com
Wed May 4 08:45:25 EDT 2011
W dniu 4 maja 2011 14:35 użytkownik Michael Büsch <m at bues.ch> napisał:
> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 12:41 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> Does it make sense to have here code:
>> case SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB:
>> tmp &= ~SSB_IMCFGLO_REQTO;
>> tmp &= ~SSB_IMCFGLO_SERTO;
>> tmp |= 0x53;
>> Does SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB still have PCI core? I though SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB is
>> some kind of native, not attached with PCI host.
> Well, is REQTO and SERTO related to the PCI core only?
No. There are two documented cases:
1) PCI (not e) cores rev < 5 need x32
2) Some BCM4311 and BCM4312 need 0x03
This SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB with 0x53 is tricky for me and seems to be undocumented.
More information about the b43-dev