Question about IMCFGLO timeouts workaround
m at bues.ch
Wed May 4 08:35:32 EDT 2011
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 12:41 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Does it make sense to have here code:
> case SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB:
> tmp &= ~SSB_IMCFGLO_REQTO;
> tmp &= ~SSB_IMCFGLO_SERTO;
> tmp |= 0x53;
> Does SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB still have PCI core? I though SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB is
> some kind of native, not attached with PCI host.
Well, is REQTO and SERTO related to the PCI core only?
More information about the b43-dev