[PATCH 2/4] bcma: allow setting FAST clockmode for a core

[Rafał Miłecki]

W dniu 19 lipca 2011 22:50 użytkownik Rafał Miłecki <zajec5 at gmail.com> napisał:
> W dniu 19 lipca 2011 22:42 użytkownik John W. Linville
> <linville at tuxdriver.com> napisał:
>>  CC [M]  drivers/bcma/core.o
>> drivers/bcma/core.c: In function ‘bcma_core_set_clockmode’:
>> drivers/bcma/core.c:65:22: error: ‘BCMA_CLKCTLST’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>> drivers/bcma/core.c:65:22: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>> drivers/bcma/core.c:65:73: error: ‘BCMA_CLKCTLST_FORCEHT’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>> drivers/bcma/core.c:69:8: error: ‘BCMA_CLKCTLST_HAVEHT’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>> drivers/bcma/core.c: In function ‘bcma_core_pll_ctl’:
>> drivers/bcma/core.c:89:35: error: ‘BCMA_CLKCTLST_EXTRESREQ’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>> drivers/bcma/core.c:90:38: error: ‘BCMA_CLKCTLST_EXTRESST’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>> drivers/bcma/core.c:93:22: error: ‘BCMA_CLKCTLST’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>> make[2]: *** [drivers/bcma/core.o] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [drivers/bcma] Error 2
>> make: *** [drivers] Error 2
>
> I'm sorry, that's quite normal you could lost order&dependency with
> the amount of patches I've sent.
>
> As nobody objected, please apply
> [RFC][PATCH] bcma: move define of BCMA_CLKCTLST register
> It should be applied before this one.

Could I do something to avoid such a problems in the future?

Should I put info about dependency in cover-letter? Should I create
own git tree? Should I slow down with sending patches (doing more of
them before sending)?

-- 
Rafał