ChipCommon as independent driver?
zajec5 at gmail.com
Fri Apr 1 12:21:47 EDT 2011
W dniu 1 kwietnia 2011 18:15 użytkownik Michael Büsch <mb at bu3sch.de> napisał:
> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 18:06 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> W dniu 1 kwietnia 2011 18:00 użytkownik Michael Büsch <mb at bu3sch.de> napisał:
>> > On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 16:49 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> >> Do you have idea how we could nicely solve that issue?
>> > Yeah. Just don't share code between ssb and bcmai.
>> > That's the only clean solution to that mess.
>> Do you want to have core drivers separated as well? Really? Should we
>> have separated pci core? chiccommon core?
> Yes. Those "drivers" are a mess full of ssb specific workarounds
> to hardware limitations.
I really don't understand what you meant in:
2011/2/18 Michael Büsch <mb at bu3sch.de>:
> Note that this does not mean that we need to duplicate the MIPS,
> common and probably pci core drivers. A hybrid module can be done,
> if that's desired to avoid code duplication.
More information about the b43-dev