ath9k_htc: Target is unresponsive

[Luis R. Rodriguez]

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Oleksij Rempel <linux at rempel-privat.de> wrote:
> Am 15.11.2013 16:33, schrieb Luis R. Rodriguez:
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Oleksij Rempel <linux at rempel-privat.de> wrote:
>>> Am 15.11.2013 15:29, schrieb Luis R. Rodriguez:
>>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Oleksij Rempel <linux at rempel-privat.de> wrote:
>>>>> I do not know which backport include patch for usb interrupt transfer.
>>>>
>>>> Which patch are you referring to? The backports project releases match
>>>> the Linux kernel releases, so the backports-3.12 release is based on
>>>> linux v3.12, we can check what kernel the patch you are describing got
>>>> merged into Linux by doing:
>>>>
>>>> git describe --contains gitsum
>>>
>>> i mean:
>>>
>>> commit 2f5e3ecfc155449987d64028ff6b73f29cd1ef8b
>>> Author: Oleksij Rempel <linux at rempel-privat.de>
>>> Date:   Tue Aug 13 09:29:34 2013 +0200
>>>
>>>     ath9k_htc: do not use bulk on EP3 and EP4
>>
>> OK that is upstream commit ID 2b721118b7
>>
>> mcgrof at frijol ~/linux-stable (git::master)$ git describe --contains
>> 2b721118b7821107757eb1d37af4b60e877b27e7
>> v3.12-rc1~132^2~84^2^2~88
>>
>> This means that patch got merged into v3.12-rc1 which means the
>> backports release based on v3.12 will have it.
>>
>>> If it is already included, then try to revert.
>>
>> What do you mean? Are you saying to try to revert that patch in case
>> v3.12 backports release causes issues with the card?
>
> yes
>
>> It seems the user
>> of this card had issues with the v3.10 release of backports which
>> would not have this patch merged.
>
> Ok. Thank you.

So to be clear -- you would recommend testing the new v3.12 release
that *has* the patch then?

  Luis