ath9k_htc: Target is unresponsive

Oleksij Rempel linux at rempel-privat.de
Fri Nov 15 11:04:09 EST 2013


Am 15.11.2013 16:33, schrieb Luis R. Rodriguez:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Oleksij Rempel <linux at rempel-privat.de> wrote:
>> Am 15.11.2013 15:29, schrieb Luis R. Rodriguez:
>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Oleksij Rempel <linux at rempel-privat.de> wrote:
>>>> I do not know which backport include patch for usb interrupt transfer.
>>>
>>> Which patch are you referring to? The backports project releases match
>>> the Linux kernel releases, so the backports-3.12 release is based on
>>> linux v3.12, we can check what kernel the patch you are describing got
>>> merged into Linux by doing:
>>>
>>> git describe --contains gitsum
>>
>> i mean:
>>
>> commit 2f5e3ecfc155449987d64028ff6b73f29cd1ef8b
>> Author: Oleksij Rempel <linux at rempel-privat.de>
>> Date:   Tue Aug 13 09:29:34 2013 +0200
>>
>>     ath9k_htc: do not use bulk on EP3 and EP4
> 
> OK that is upstream commit ID 2b721118b7
> 
> mcgrof at frijol ~/linux-stable (git::master)$ git describe --contains
> 2b721118b7821107757eb1d37af4b60e877b27e7
> v3.12-rc1~132^2~84^2^2~88
> 
> This means that patch got merged into v3.12-rc1 which means the
> backports release based on v3.12 will have it.
> 
>> If it is already included, then try to revert.
> 
> What do you mean? Are you saying to try to revert that patch in case
> v3.12 backports release causes issues with the card?

yes

> It seems the user
> of this card had issues with the v3.10 release of backports which
> would not have this patch merged.

Ok. Thank you.

-- 
Regards,
Oleksij



More information about the ath9k_htc_fw mailing list