[PATCH v2] wifi: ath11k: move power type check to ASSOC stage when connecting to 6 GHz AP
Jeff Johnson
quic_jjohnson at quicinc.com
Tue May 21 09:27:29 PDT 2024
On 5/20/2024 10:27 PM, Baochen Qiang wrote:
>
>
> On 5/21/2024 1:12 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang at quicinc.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 5/20/2024 11:34 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>>> Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang at quicinc.com> writes:
>>>>> On 5/11/2024 5:54 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, this fell through the cracks. Commit bc8a0fac8677 was introduced in
>>>>>> v6.9-rc1 so I should have sent this to v6.9 but it's too late now. I'll
>>>>>> need to queue this for v6.10 via wireless tree.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Adding the regression also to regzbot:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #regzbot introduced: bc8a0fac8677
>>>>>> #regzbot title: ath11k: connection to 6 GHz AP fails
>>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Kalle, with an upcoming patch this regression is expected to be fixed:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240506214536.310434f55f76.I6aca291ee06265e3f63e0f9024ba19a850b53a33@changeid/#t
>>>>>
>>>>> So here the ath11k fix would not be needed any more once above patch got merged.
>>>>
>>>> What happens if we apply both patch 'wifi: ath11k: move power type check
>>>> to ASSOC stage when connecting to 6 GHz AP' and patchset 'wifi:
>>>> mac80211: build TPE handling'? In other words, do they conflict from
>>>> functionality point of view?
>>>
>>> No functional conflict, 6 GHz AP connection would also succeed with
>>> both of them applied.
>>
>> Ok, thanks. In that case I would like take patch 'wifi: ath11k: move
>> power type check to ASSOC stage when connecting to 6 GHz AP' to
>> ath-current branch from which it will go to v6.10. Is that ok for
>> everyone?
> Good to me.
Good to me, too
More information about the ath11k
mailing list