[PATCH v2] wifi: ath11k: move power type check to ASSOC stage when connecting to 6 GHz AP
Baochen Qiang
quic_bqiang at quicinc.com
Mon May 20 22:27:00 PDT 2024
On 5/21/2024 1:12 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang at quicinc.com> writes:
>
>> On 5/20/2024 11:34 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang at quicinc.com> writes:
>>>> On 5/11/2024 5:54 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Oh, this fell through the cracks. Commit bc8a0fac8677 was introduced in
>>>>> v6.9-rc1 so I should have sent this to v6.9 but it's too late now. I'll
>>>>> need to queue this for v6.10 via wireless tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> Adding the regression also to regzbot:
>>>>>
>>>>> #regzbot introduced: bc8a0fac8677
>>>>> #regzbot title: ath11k: connection to 6 GHz AP fails
>>>>>
>>>> Hi Kalle, with an upcoming patch this regression is expected to be fixed:
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240506214536.310434f55f76.I6aca291ee06265e3f63e0f9024ba19a850b53a33@changeid/#t
>>>>
>>>> So here the ath11k fix would not be needed any more once above patch got merged.
>>>
>>> What happens if we apply both patch 'wifi: ath11k: move power type check
>>> to ASSOC stage when connecting to 6 GHz AP' and patchset 'wifi:
>>> mac80211: build TPE handling'? In other words, do they conflict from
>>> functionality point of view?
>>
>> No functional conflict, 6 GHz AP connection would also succeed with
>> both of them applied.
>
> Ok, thanks. In that case I would like take patch 'wifi: ath11k: move
> power type check to ASSOC stage when connecting to 6 GHz AP' to
> ath-current branch from which it will go to v6.10. Is that ok for
> everyone?
Good to me.
>
More information about the ath11k
mailing list