[PATCH] ath11k: Update tx descriptor search index properly
Karthikeyan periyasamy
periyasa at codeaurora.org
Wed Feb 3 20:08:46 EST 2021
On 2021-02-04 00:59, Peter Oh wrote:
> On 1/26/21 6:46 PM, Karthikeyan periyasamy wrote:
>> On 2020-12-19 00:53, Peter Oh wrote:
>>> On 12/18/20 7:24 AM, Karthikeyan Periyasamy wrote:
>>>> Tx descriptor search index field should be updated with hw peer id
>>>> and not by AST Hash. Incorrect search index causes throughput
>>>> degradation
>>>> in all the platforms. so updated the search index field with hw peer
>>>> id,
>>>> which is a common change applicable for all the platforms.
>>>>
>>>> Tested-on: IPQ8074 hw2.0 AHB
>>>> WLAN.HK.2.4.0.1-01492-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c
>>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c
>>>> index b69e7eb..f49abefa 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c
>>>>
>>>> @@ -309,7 +310,11 @@ int ath11k_peer_create(struct ath11k *ar,
>>>> struct ath11k_vif *arvif,
>>>> peer->pdev_idx = ar->pdev_idx;
>>>> peer->sta = sta;
>>>> - arvif->ast_hash = peer->ast_hash;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (arvif->vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) {
>>>> + arvif->ast_hash = peer->ast_hash;
>>>> + arvif->ast_idx = peer->hw_peer_id;
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> How about non STATION type?
>>>
>>
>> no need of configuring the ast_idx, ast_hash field for non station
>> type. Its recommended by HW/FW team.
>>
> Can you add this comment in commit message?
>
sure
> Also could you include the answer to "what conditions you observed the
> throughput degradation?" in commit message too?
In all the scenario will see degradation. Its a general improvement.
Regards,
Karthikeyan P
More information about the ath11k
mailing list