[PATCH] ath11k: Update tx descriptor search index properly
Peter Oh
peter.oh at eero.com
Wed Feb 3 14:29:45 EST 2021
On 1/26/21 6:46 PM, Karthikeyan periyasamy wrote:
> On 2020-12-19 00:53, Peter Oh wrote:
>> On 12/18/20 7:24 AM, Karthikeyan Periyasamy wrote:
>>> Tx descriptor search index field should be updated with hw peer id
>>> and not by AST Hash. Incorrect search index causes throughput
>>> degradation
>>> in all the platforms. so updated the search index field with hw peer
>>> id,
>>> which is a common change applicable for all the platforms.
>>>
>>> Tested-on: IPQ8074 hw2.0 AHB WLAN.HK.2.4.0.1-01492-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c
>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c
>>> index b69e7eb..f49abefa 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c
>>>
>>> @@ -309,7 +310,11 @@ int ath11k_peer_create(struct ath11k *ar,
>>> struct ath11k_vif *arvif,
>>> peer->pdev_idx = ar->pdev_idx;
>>> peer->sta = sta;
>>> - arvif->ast_hash = peer->ast_hash;
>>> +
>>> + if (arvif->vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) {
>>> + arvif->ast_hash = peer->ast_hash;
>>> + arvif->ast_idx = peer->hw_peer_id;
>>> + }
>>
>> How about non STATION type?
>>
>
> no need of configuring the ast_idx, ast_hash field for non station
> type. Its recommended by HW/FW team.
>
Can you add this comment in commit message?
Also could you include the answer to "what conditions you observed the
throughput degradation?" in commit message too?
Thanks,
Peter
More information about the ath11k
mailing list