QCA6174 SDIO support?

[Marek Behun]

This branch is almost the same as mine (orig + high latency patches +
sdio patches), therefore no QCA6174 SDIO node in ath10k_hw_params_list.

On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 02:31:59 +0100
Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall at dd-wrt.com> wrote:

> try this branch
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/log/?h=ath10k-pending-sdio-usb
> 
> Am 08.01.2018 um 01:28 schrieb Marek Behun:
> > Hello,
> >
> > we at CZ.NIC are trying the current ath10k driver with High Latency
> > + SDIO support (which was done by Silex Technology) on our board.
> > The supported chip, QCA9377, works, but we only have 1x1 MIMO
> > boards with this chip. We are trying to get it work with 8274B-SR
> > (QCA6174)
> > ( http://www.fn-link.com/a-b-g-n-ac-wi-fi-bt-module/8274b-sr.html )
> >
> > There is already some code in sdio.c mentoining QCA6174, but there
> > are no nodes in ath10k_hw_params. Because QCA6174 is supported via
> > PCI bus, I tried to write the ath10k_hw_params node (see patch
> > http://blackhole.sk/~kabel/src/qca6174.patch ) but do not know if
> > the changes I did are enough, because the driver fails after loading
> > firmware.
> >
> > And the firmware is another point: Does board-sdio.bin have to be
> > different from board.bin? Do we have to create this binary
> > ourselves, or should the 8274B-SR board manufacturer sent us one?
> > (We didn't receive anything from fn-link.)
> >
> > Any information is good, please let us know even if you have NDA on
> > this and therefore cannot give any more information about this.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Marek Behun, CZ.NIC
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ath10k mailing list
> > ath10k at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
> >  
>