[RFC v3 0/8] ath10k sdio support

[Erik Stromdahl]

Hej,

I just noticed that Ryan Hsu submitted two patches containing similar
functionality to what I have in my tree on github. They have not been
integrated in the ath master yet, but they have been added to master-pending.

Below are the commits I am talking about

bc1054a15be3c962c83aa22476a3e9c1266da792 ath10k: improve the firmware download time for QCA9377
db5af2a25bd8c1410ec4456d1d4f4e6ded2649ca ath10k: improve the firmware download time for QCA6174

Since some of my patches overlap with these I think it would be best if
I add these to my tree and rewrite my patches.

If they haven't made it into master before I submit my updated patch series
I will include them in my set.

Is this OK?

If they will be added to master soon there is no issue since I will of course
rebase to the latest ath-YYYYMMDDHHmm before I submit anything.

/Erik

On 2017-02-19 00:57, Valo, Kalle wrote:
> Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I was actually about to email you about this.
>>
>> I have made a few more updates to the sdio code so I think it would be
>> best if I could submit a new series of patches based on this code (v4).
>>
>> Then you can tweak it (v5).
>>
>> It is only minor updates to the HIF layer (added QCA9377 support) and
>> a setup of some pll registers.
>
> Ok, that sounds good. I'll wait for v4.
>
>> btw, should I still mark them as RFC or should it be PATCH this time?
>>
>> If I go for PATCH, should the version be v4 or should I start from v1?
>
> v4 would be fine. Thanks.
>