[PATCH] ath: use PRI value given by spec for fixed PRI
poh at codeaurora.org
Wed Apr 15 10:10:20 PDT 2015
On 04/15/2015 05:41 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Peter Oh <poh at codeaurora.org> writes:
>>> As for your patch at hand, I tested it for ETSI and it does not
>>> change detector performance,
>> The patch is useful when there are many missing pulses within a burst.
>> It happens almost every time when channel loading rate is higher than
>> 40%, but around 30% channel loading does not miss pulses that much.
>>> therefore (please replace 16 with PRI_TOLERANCE in the macro)
>> I'll do.
>>> Acked-by: Zefir Kurtisi <zefir.kurtisi at neratec.com>
> So what's the conclusion? Should I wait for v2 or is this good to
> commit? I didn't quite get Zefir's comment about PRI_TOLERANCE above.
Please wait for 2nd patches. I'll prepare the patches that do not void
this current products certificate.
More information about the ath10k