[PATCH] ath: use PRI value given by spec for fixed PRI

[Kalle Valo]

Peter Oh <poh at codeaurora.org> writes:

>> As for your patch at hand, I tested it for ETSI and it does not
>> change detector performance,
>
> The patch is useful when there are many missing pulses within a burst.
> It happens almost every time when channel loading rate is higher than
> 40%, but around 30% channel loading does not miss pulses that much.
>
>> therefore (please replace 16 with PRI_TOLERANCE in the macro)
>
> I'll do.
>
>> Acked-by: Zefir Kurtisi <zefir.kurtisi at neratec.com>

So what's the conclusion? Should I wait for v2 or is this good to
commit? I didn't quite get Zefir's comment about PRI_TOLERANCE above.

-- 
Kalle Valo