speedtch speedtch.c,1.81,1.82

[David Woodhouse]

On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 10:47 +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> They are neater that way, but awfully long.  Another solution would be
> to factor some of this code out into another function, which would
> reduce the amount of indentation. 

The better solution, endorsed by Linus, is just to leave them as they
were.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/23/189
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/23/203

-- 
dwmw2