sending zero length skb's

Duncan Sands baldrick at
Tue May 3 10:29:08 EDT 2005

> Right, I assumed there's no reason to send a zero length skb out.  Was
> that wrong?  I might have misinterpreted the protocol description...

Are you sure that the skb is simply not sent?  If so, that's fine by me.
I got the impression that things got into a bit of a mess in that case.
Did you test it?



More information about the Usbatm mailing list