rx_err vs rx_drop
Duncan Sands
baldrick at free.fr
Tue May 3 05:48:18 EDT 2005
In the usbatm (i.e. speedtch) driver, we don't support OAM cells
right now, so we do:
if (pti == ATM_PTI_E2EF5) {
atm_warn(instance, "%s: OAM not supported (vpi %d, vci %d)!\n", __func__, vpi, vci);
atomic_inc(&vcc->stats->rx_err);
continue;
}
Is it correct to increment rx_err, or should we be incrementing
rx_drop? The comment on rx_drop is:
__HANDLE_ITEM(rx_drop); /* RX out of memory */
We didn't run out of memory, but we do drop the packet...
Thanks for your help,
Duncan.
More information about the Usbatm
mailing list