iso support status.

matthieu castet castet.matthieu at free.fr
Sat Jun 18 14:47:44 EDT 2005


hi Duncan,

Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Matthieu,
> 
> 
>>We plan to release a first version of ueagle-atm, and depreciate 
>>eagle-usb for 2.6 kernel.
>>
>>But we'll like to have a working usbatm upstream.
> 
> 
> Fair enough.
> 
> 
>>Are you ok to implement modem quirk (mask EILSEQ status for eagle) ?
> 
> 
> Yes.
> 
> 
>>How to we should control it : module option, option control per subdriver ?
>>I like more the second, has we could have on the same machine 
>>sub-drivers that need quirk and others that don't need it.
> 
> 
> Well, we could just always mask it.  Otherwise, I suppose adding a
> flag to struct usbatm_driver would do the trick.
> 
> 
>>Could you find a way to select iso pipe method and have a good default 
>>for buffer size ?
>>
>>There is Roman method which consist in initialised driver internal 
>>before .bind call, then the modem could overwrite it if it want, and 
>>then usbatm use it.
>>
>>I prefer to have and other option in usbatm_driver, as it will allow 
>>static and dynamic allocation (why a modem could not support only iso 
>>pipe for example ?).
>>Also it avoid that the sub-driver access private data and it much 
>>cleaner (don't depend of the order of init in usbatm).
> 
> 
> I hope to work on iso support for the speedtouch later this week.
> I'll get back to you on this then.
> 

any new about this ?

I will be busy until 21 June, but I could provide some patch if you want.

Regards

Matthieu

PS : what about my other mail about kthread killing and pending urb ?



More information about the Usbatm mailing list