speedtch usbatm.h,1.4,1.5 usbatm2.c,1.13,1.14

Duncan Sands duncan.sands at math.u-psud.fr
Fri Jan 28 07:38:55 EST 2005

> Even more so: you're relying on the .heavy_init to be prepared to be
> SIGTERMed at any time.  This IMO is a much stronger assumption than
> its being quick to exit.

I don't see what the problem is.  You won't be terminated - you're a
kernel thread after all.  But if you are doing an interruptible sleep
then you will be woken up - and that's all I'm looking for.  I could
be wrong - I've no in-kernel signal experience.



More information about the Usbatm mailing list