rkagan at mail.ru
Fri Jan 28 06:50:30 EST 2005
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 11:13:42AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Oh yeah, sorry. Messages with 'In-Reply-To' or 'References' headers but
> without 'Re:' in the subject are considered suspicious because some
I see. I wish it at least be more specific complaining.
> Neither of those is particularly relevant on a list which is as quiet as
> this one, so I suppose we could turn them off. Or we could just avoid
> doing it most of the time, and manually approve messages occasionally.
Whichever you like, I'm fine with either.
Sorry for bugging you so much this morning,
More information about the Usbatm