speedtch testatm.c,1.4,1.5

Duncan Sands baldrick at free.fr
Sat Apr 9 12:08:23 EDT 2005

> The following trivial patch makes it behave somewhat better.  The
> endpoint number of 1 is arbitrary, the important thing is supposedly
> that it differs from 0.  Can't outline the exact scenario which led to
> the failures, though...

Hi Roman, I'm confused... shouldn't there only be trouble if you
try to send packets or open a connection (that starts the
receive tasklet)?


More information about the Usbatm mailing list