speedtch testatm.c,1.4,1.5
Duncan Sands
baldrick at free.fr
Sat Apr 9 12:08:23 EDT 2005
> The following trivial patch makes it behave somewhat better. The
> endpoint number of 1 is arbitrary, the important thing is supposedly
> that it differs from 0. Can't outline the exact scenario which led to
> the failures, though...
Hi Roman, I'm confused... shouldn't there only be trouble if you
try to send packets or open a connection (that starts the
receive tasklet)?
D.
More information about the Usbatm
mailing list