[RFC] [PATCH] usbatm.[ch]: multiple changes

matthieu castet castet.matthieu at free.fr
Mon Apr 4 14:24:29 EDT 2005

Hi Roman,

Roman Kagan wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 10:48:30PM +0200, matthieu castet wrote:
>>Roman Kagan wrote:
> FWIW I've taken a look at the code from eagle-usb.org, and they are
> using 16 iso frames per urb in iso mode and 64 atm cells per urb in bulk
> mode.
> BTW are you basing your code on theirs?
My code is based more more based on ueagle.
If you are interested there is some preview here : 

Also the bulk mode don't work well with eagle-usb, there are lot's of 
errors like usb-atm. That's why iso is the default.

>>No there still -EILSEQ errors, but in your code there a timer, that
>>resubmit in case of error. But yes, your patch ignoring -EILSEQ is needed.
>>I also try on an intel chipset and there is the same error...
> Then I would seriously consider trying to replace cable / firmware /
> modem.  There are no workarounds for -EILSEQ in eagle-usb.org code, nor
All the errors are ignored in eagle-usb.org, so you can't see it.

> there's any reference to the kind of errors you see in their forum or
> docs, which makes me suspect a hardware problem.
No this was confirmed by a developper :



More information about the Usbatm mailing list