[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ar71xx: add support for GL.iNet GL-X1200
Wang guilin
guilin.wang at gl-inet.com
Tue Aug 28 05:30:12 EDT 2018
Hi,Sven
I am using the QCA9886 chip for the first time. I saw the example you gave.
I think the following code should be deleted.
ln -sf /lib/firmware/ath10k/pre-cal-pci-0000\:00\:00.0.bin /lib/firmware/ath10k/QCA9888/hw2.0/board.bin
Thank you
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Sven Eckelmann"<sven.eckelmann at openmesh.com>;
Date: Tue, Aug 28, 2018 04:04 PM
To: "John Crispin"<john at phrozen.org>;
Cc: "wellnw"<guilin.wang at gl-inet.com>; "openwrt-devel"<openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org>;
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ar71xx: add support for GL.iNet GL-X1200
On Dienstag, 28. August 2018 09:38:39 CEST John Crispin wrote:
> > +gl-x1200)
> > + ucidef_set_led_wlan "wlan2g" "WLAN2G" "$board:green:wlan2g" "phy1tpt"
> > + ucidef_set_led_wlan "wlan5g" "WLAN5G" "$board:green:wlan5g" "phy0tpt"
> > + ;;
>
> this section aswell as several other places in this patch is not
> alphabetically ordered. please fix all occurrences
And this section could also be merged together with the gl-ar750s section.
> > + gl-x1200)
> > + ath10kcal_extract "art" 20480 12064
> > + ln -sf /lib/firmware/ath10k/pre-cal-pci-0000\:00\:00.0.bin \
> > + /lib/firmware/ath10k/QCA9888/hw2.0/board.bin
> > + ath10kcal_patch_mac $(macaddr_add $(cat /sys/class/net/eth0/address) +1)
> > + ;;
[...]
> > + DEVICE_PACKAGES := kmod-ath10k ath10k-firmware-qca9887 kmod-usb-core \
> > + kmod-usb2 kmod-usb-storage
Is the 5GHz now a QCA9888 or a QCA9887? And why are you linking the pre-cal
data to board.bin? QCA9888 has its BDF stored in the board-2.bin [1] (selected by
the bmi from the OTP and the variant string from DT/SMBIOS) and per device
pre-cal data is stored in /lib/firmware/ath10k/pre-cal-*.bin. The OTP is then
merging both and applying extra modifications on top of it. The result is then
automatically given to the actual QCA9888 firmware.
See for example the OpenMesh A62 for an device with an QCA9888. As you may
notice, it is using device tree - something which ar71xx is not using. But the
new target ath79 does.
Kind regards,
Sven
[1] https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/713#issuecomment-369511149
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
More information about the openwrt-devel
mailing list