[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: fix SUPPORTED_DEVICES for TL-MR3020

[Chuanhong Guo]

I've just noticed that Image metadata isn't required on ar71xx so at
least fot TP-LINK devices ar71xx accept factory firmware.

Dmitry Tunin <hanipouspilot at gmail.com> 于2018年8月19日周日 下午7:34写道：
>
> вс, 19 авг. 2018 г. в 14:29, Dmitry Tunin <hanipouspilot at gmail.com>:
> >
> > вс, 19 авг. 2018 г. в 12:28, Mathias Kresin <dev at kresin.me>:
> > >
> > > 18.08.2018 14:01, David Bauer:
> > > > Sysupgrading to ath79 from ar71xx currently fails because of mismatching
> > > > supported_devices. ar71xx is expecting "tl-mr3020" which is missing in
> > > > the ath79 image. Upgrading from ath79 is unaffected, as the image
> > > > contains the old string for ar71xx and the new one coming from the
> > > > device-tree.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: David Bauer <mail at david-bauer.net>
> > > > ---
> > > >   target/linux/ath79/image/tiny-tp-link.mk | 2 +-
> > > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/target/linux/ath79/image/tiny-tp-link.mk b/target/linux/ath79/image/tiny-tp-link.mk
> > > > index 6ccc9d7dba..dadcd24b42 100644
> > > > --- a/target/linux/ath79/image/tiny-tp-link.mk
> > > > +++ b/target/linux/ath79/image/tiny-tp-link.mk
> > > > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ define Device/tplink_tl-mr3020-v1
> > > >     DEVICE_TITLE := TP-LINK TL-MR3020 v1
> > > >     DEVICE_PACKAGES := kmod-usb-core kmod-usb-chipidea2 kmod-usb-ledtrig-usbport
> > > >     TPLINK_HWID := 0x30200001
> > > > -  SUPPORTED_DEVICES += tl-mr3020-v1
> > > > +  SUPPORTED_DEVICES += tl-mr3020
> > > >   endef
> > > >   TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_tl-mr3020-v1
> > >
> > > I was the opinion it's the ar71xx boardname and it's added to allow an
> > > update from the ar71xx image. But lets do the obvious and ask the
> > > author.
> > >
> > > Dmitry, was the SUPPORTED_DEVICES added to allow an update from the
> > > ar71xx image?
> > >
> > > Mathias
> >
> > Exactly. The idea was to allow updates. We are moving to ath79 and I
> > don't think that this is nice to create problems in upgrade for users.
> > When we are ready to release with ath79 images, we'll need to add the
> > supported devices back.
> >
> > Now only those who can build images themselves are using, si I see no
> > reason why don't we leave the easy upgrade path.
>
> But I was no the author of MR3020, I added MR3040.
>
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel