[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: Add support of Tp_Link MR-3040 v2
Dmitry Tunin
hanipouspilot at gmail.com
Mon Aug 13 12:55:06 EDT 2018
13.08.2018 19:34, Mathias Kresin пишет:
> 2018-08-13 18:28 GMT+02:00 Dmitry Tunin <hanipouspilot at gmail.com>:
>> Add support for the ar71xx supported Tp_link MR-3040 v2 to ath79.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Tunin <hanipouspilot at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> .../linux/ath79/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 1 +
>> .../linux/ath79/dts/ar9331_tplink_tl-mr3040-v2.dts | 161 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> target/linux/ath79/image/tiny-tp-link.mk | 10 ++
>> 3 files changed, 172 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9331_tplink_tl-mr3040-v2.dts
>>
>> diff --git a/target/linux/ath79/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network b/target/linux/ath79/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network
>> index 9e315ee..bfbc1ac 100755
>> --- a/target/linux/ath79/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network
>> +++ b/target/linux/ath79/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ ath79_setup_interfaces()
>> tplink,re450-v2|\
>> tplink,tl-mr10u|\
>> tplink,tl-mr3020-v1|\
>> + tplink,tl-mr3040-v2|\
>> tplink,tl-wr703n|\
>> ubnt,unifiac-lite|\
>> ubnt,unifiac-mesh|\
>> diff --git a/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9331_tplink_tl-mr3040-v2.dts b/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9331_tplink_tl-mr3040-v2.dts
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..d72839e
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9331_tplink_tl-mr3040-v2.dts
>> @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/dts-v1/;
>> +
>> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
>> +
>> +#include "ar9331.dtsi"
>> +
>> +/ {
>> + model = "TP-Link TL-MR3040 V2";
>> + compatible = "tplink,tl-mr3040-v2", "qca,ar9331";
>> +
>> + leds {
>> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
>> +
>> + wlan {
>> + label = "tp-link:green:wlan";
>> + gpios = <&gpio 26 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + default-state = "off";
>> + linux,default-trigger = "phy0tpt";
>> + };
>> +
>> + lan {
>> + label = "tp-link:green:lan";
>> + gpios = <&gpio 17 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + default-state = "off";
>> + linux,default-trigger = "netdev:eth0";
> I'm not sure if we should do it this way. I already dislike the
> phy0tpt trigger in the devicetree source files, as it makes assumption
> on how the interface is named in linux/in which order the wireless is
> registered.
>
> Something similar to the way the usbport triggers are handled - with
> device name evaluation during runtime - would make more sense to me.
>
> Any opinions about it?
>
> Mathias
In this case the device has only one Ethernet port. In other cases I
agree that this is not the best idea to assign LEDs this way.
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
More information about the openwrt-devel
mailing list