[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] base-files: make wifi report unknown command
Karl Palsson
karlp at tweak.net.au
Tue Aug 7 05:48:46 EDT 2018
Jo-Philipp Wich <jo at mein.io> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > respectfully, the behaviour of the "wifi" command is one of the most
> > obtuse parts of openwrt's tooling. It does "something" with no
> > command output, and responds ~instantly. This is expected
> > behaviour for very few people. even "wifi asdfasdfa" returns
> > ~instantly, with no warning that it is an unknown command. Does the
> > command perhaps not take arguments? What would they be?
>
> The (implicit) default command could be explicitly spelled out
> as "wifi apply" or similar, mentioned in the usage and called
> when no argument is provided.
>
> Is that what you were thinking?
Personally I'd like to see the "apply" (or any other name) added,
and the implicit action dropped. Or at the very least, the
implicit action only taken when there are no arguments. At
present, you get the implicit action with no args, and with any
arg that doesn't match some other args. I'd suggest it is more
reasonable that unknown args are not treated as some default,
which is what the original patch suggested. It was definitely
broken however in that the implicit step was no longer available.
Something like this say....
This lets "wifi" still do the same as before.
This makes "wifi adsfads" print usage arguments
This makes "wifi enable interfacename" do the same as "wifi
interfacename" did before, if anyone knew about that.
The usage text could/should be expanded still, but hoenstly, I
don't know the difference between them all. What's the difference
between config and detect? should detect be listed in the usage?
what's reload_legacy? when would I want it? Should it be listed
in the usage? What's the difference between enable and reload?
Why is there down but no up? (it's like "enable" but not quite?)
Sincerely,
Karl Palsson
diff --git a/package/base-files/files/sbin/wifi
b/package/base-files/files/sbin/wifi index 83befc0d6f..cbe7e950bd
100755
--- a/package/base-files/files/sbin/wifi
+++ b/package/base-files/files/sbin/wifi
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
usage() {
cat <<EOF
-Usage: $0 [config|down|reload|status]
+Usage: $0 [config|down|enable|reload|status]
enables (default), disables or configures devices not yet configured.
EOF
exit 1
@@ -233,6 +233,13 @@ DRIVERS=
include /lib/wifi
scan_wifi
+[ $# -lt 2 ] && {
+ echo "Implicitly applying config"
+ ubus call network reload
+ wifi_updown "enable"
+ exit 0
+}
+
case "$1" in
down) wifi_updown "disable" "$2";;
detect) wifi_detect_notice ;;
@@ -241,5 +248,6 @@ case "$1" in
reload) wifi_reload "$2";;
reload_legacy) wifi_reload_legacy "$2";;
--help|help) usage;;
- *) ubus call network reload; wifi_updown "enable" "$2";;
+ enable) ubus call network reload; wifi_updown "enable" "$2";;
+ *) usage; exit 1;;
esac
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.html
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1161 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP Digital Signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/attachments/20180807/796d2bef/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
More information about the openwrt-devel
mailing list