[vote] Update OpenWrt rules

[Christian Marangi (Ansuel)]

Il giorno mar 4 nov 2025 alle ore 22:40 Hauke Mehrtens
<hauke at hauke-m.de> ha scritto:
>
> On 11/4/25 16:33, Imre Kaloz wrote:
> > Hi Hauke,
> >
> > On 11/4/25 11:54, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> >
> >>>> It is currently very hard to get any vote done, so we want to change the
> >>>> quorum. To do this change we also need the votes from the practical
> >>>> inactive members of the project. If you agree to these rule changes
> >>>> please send a mail to the mailing list with +1 or agree as an answer to
> >>>> the mail:
> >>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-adm/2025-October/002789.html
> >>>
> >>> A few of us is still waiting on the public list for you to validate this claim.
> >>
> >> I replayed to some mails, in the other items I agree with David
> >> Woodhouse and do not have much to add. I think part of the discussion is
> >> anyway going in circles. Which concrete mail are you talking about?
> >
> > Please list all votes that have failed due to the lack of quorum.
> >
> >
> > Imre
>
> Hi Imre,
>
> <moving the discussion to the mailing list>
>
> These votes failed because they did not get the quorum:
> https://openwrt.org/voting/2025-04-04-private-mailing-list
> https://openwrt.org/voting/2025-04-04-new-member-dragonbluep
>
> I think the vote regarding the OpenWrt Two only passed because John
> pinged multiple people.
>

Not only that but also most of the new member votes passed by pure luck.
Situation improved in the last year because with the new (active)
member we manage to reach the +1 to the quorum more easily.

But I want to stress something that maybe it's not clear in all these
discussions. The object here is not to exclude any member, actually
it's to identify MIA members.

It's specified that members can be set as active (if they were flagged
as inactive) by simply sending a mail.

There is already an intention to fix the rule right after this vote and
honestly I don't think anyone will be against any kind of improvement.