Wording in the Project Documentation - OpenWRT (former LEDE)

[Elias Magnus Haisch]

Hi all,

since the current discussion about the voting rules is not advancing, at 
least not here in that list.I looked up the https://openwrt.org/rules 
page for any changes and i am wondering why its calling openwrt the 
former LEDE project. When i startet to use openwrt and follow its 
development it was at version kamikaze. Back then there was no lede 
project i did recognize. I remember there was a conflict with the lede 
fork which was overcome later and it got merged again. The name openwrt 
persistet. I think i saw this kind of wording before which is 
missleading to me. OpenWRT is a project which changed through the 
influence of the lede fork but its still OpenWRT?

Perhaps someone can lead me to the important bits (perhaps a link) of 
why this wording could be correct, perhaps i just dont know some 
important facts about LEDE and this is where my missunderstanding comes 
from. To my understanding Lede was supposed to be the former OpenWRT 
Project but it did not became it? I am confused and i am sorry if i put 
salt in an old wound, since this is not what i want to do.

quote: " The only role distinction within the OpenWrt (former LEDE) 
project is between committers and non-committers, there is no core 
developer group or other specially privileged members."

Yes its probably not urgent.I am sorry if i just missed something, even 
already years ago.

With good intent

Elias