[vote] release OpenWrt 21.02 with additional SELinux SDKs and IBs
Fernando Frediani
fhfrediani at gmail.com
Thu Mar 18 12:28:51 GMT 2021
These are important questions, perhaps even more than the benefits it
may bring.
Regards
> On 18/03/2021 05:24, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> What does the support experience look like?
>>
>> For an end user for whom something is failing due to an SELinux
>> denial... what do they see in the logs? Are they supposed to
>> *recognise* the typical audit logs and realise that they need to file a
>> ticket, and/or set SELinux to permissive mode until it's fixed?
>>
>> Where do they file a ticket? Are the SELinux "team" going to handle
>> those, much as the owners of the selinux-policy package tend to in
>> Fedora? Or do they end up at the door of random package maintainers,
>> who will have very little clue how to handle them, and very little
>> inclination to care?
>>
>> Or are we not actually talking about *enabling* SELinux in any default
>> builds just yet, and merely providing the tools so that sufficiently
>> clueful developers can *start* to build it and develop policies, and
>> maybe in a year or three we'll be able to talk about enabling it by
>> default (or through luci without having to rebuild for it), and *then*
>> we get to have the discussion about support?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openwrt-adm mailing list
>> openwrt-adm at lists.openwrt.org
>> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-adm
More information about the openwrt-adm
mailing list