Revising OpenWrt Rules - Minimal-invasive approach

[Aaron Z]

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:12 PM Rich Brown <richb.hanover at gmail.com> wrote:
> > A formal proposal to vote shall follow this process: A brief description of the proposal must be moved and seconded on the OpenWrt-Adm list. After any discussion has settled, any decision maker may call the question, request a vote on a final draft of the proposal, and specify how long the vote will be held open.
> This makes it clear that;
> - There's a clear process to advance a proposal for a formal vote
> - We have a written description of what we're being asked to voted on
> - There's a mechanism for "limiting debate" when the positions have become clear
> - Each proposal can set its own duration for keeping the vote open
Not a comitter, but it seems that if there is a time limit, there
should be a minimum (and a maximum?) time for said voting.
It seems to me that 2-4 weeks would be a good length of time for
voting for routine matters.

Aaron Z