[LEDE-DEV] 18.06 Status?
John Crispin
john at phrozen.org
Sun May 6 03:56:13 EDT 2018
On 06/05/18 09:43, Jaap Buurman wrote:
> Dear John,
>
> That is most excellent to hear :) Please disregard my previous
> comment. Where did this decision take place by the way? I tried
> searching the mailing list but couldn't find anything. My apologies
> for bothering the mailing list with this porposal while it was already
> taken care of.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Jaap Buurman
>
> On Sat, May 5, 2018, 19:57 John Crispin <john at phrozen.org
> <mailto:john at phrozen.org>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 05/05/18 12:27, Jaap Buurman wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I feel like everybody is just waiting for everybody to agree what
> > features we want in before coming up with the next step of picking a
> > date. Obviously this isn't working out very well. Why not turn
> things
> > around? Pick a date in a few weeks time on which the Master branch
> > will be split to a 18.0X branch. If nobody complains before that
> date
> > the branch goes on as planned. People can obviously get in the
> > features they want before said date. If somebody deems a particular
> > feature very important to be included in this branch, but feels like
> > it will not be finished before said date, he/she can request a delay
> > stating:
> >
> > -What he/she would like to include
> > -Why this is so important to be included before the branch.
> > -How much extra time this will need by proposing a new date
> > -Perhaps a request for help implementing said change
> >
> > Should this proposal be accepted, we will reschedule the date from
> > there. If the other people don't think it is important enough to
> > postpone the release, the old date will stand. This way, we can
> simply
> > move forward if nobody complains about a particular date instead of
> > the waiting around for others that is going on right now. What does
> > everybody else think of this idea? What seems like a reasonable
> date?
> > And who would be willing to take on the task of splitting the branch
> > at said date to make sure we'll be actually moving forward with the
> > plan at said date?
> >
> > Yours sincerely,
> >
> > Jaap Buurman
> >
> > On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 4:41 AM, Eric Luehrsen
> <ericluehrsen at gmail.com <mailto:ericluehrsen at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> On 05/01/2018 10:47 AM, Hannu Nyman wrote:
> >>> I think that the main source tree is in pretty good shape, so
> branching
> >>> off the 18.0X rather soon might make sense....
> >>
> >> I would also think its time to branch 18.[something-soon], and
> rather than
> >> focus on work that needs yet to be completed, look to cut
> hardware and
> >> packages that are not ready for a release. There is always some
> heart ache
> >> when such decisions are made, but at a point those decisions do
> need to be
> >> made. Without an official release to punctuate both the core
> team and other
> >> packagers hard work, OpenWrt/LEDE could risk losing support
> from the
> >> community and its limited sponsorship. I imagine this project means
> >> something personally to the core team, so those risks should be
> considered.
> >>
> >> - Eric
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lede-adm mailing list
> >> lede-adm at lists.infradead.org <mailto:lede-adm at lists.infradead.org>
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-adm
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lede-dev mailing list
> > Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org <mailto:Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org>
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>
> we agreed already to branch on friday but delayed it till start of
> the
> week as we ran out of time before calling it a day.
> John
>
>
Hi,
please dont top post. The discussion happened here on the ML. we
exchanged mails that we will do a 18.06 and now with june coming up we
exchanged 5 lines on IRC trying to figure out when we have time to do
the branching. this whole discussion is just creating FUD. we announced
18.06 almost 2 months ago and now with june coming up we are executing
the plan. no more no less. i really dont understand the commotion.
thanks to alberto for providing some useful comments to the discussion.
John
More information about the openwrt-adm
mailing list