Fading out PolarSSL
Steven Barth
steven at midlink.org
Tue Jan 3 11:32:51 EST 2017
Hey everyone,
> Currently known remaining users of polarssl are:
>
> * bmx7
> * pianod
> * shadowsocks-libev-polarssl
> * shairport-sync-mini
> * shairport-sync-polarssl
> * transmission-cli-polarssl
> * transmission-daemon-polarssl
> * transmission-remote-polarssl
> * umurmur-polarssl
>
>
> Please provide feedback on which approach you'd prefer and if you'd be
> affected by the PolarSSL deprecation or not.
I think for all but the first two from this list, there is a
non-polarssl version already packaged.
Which would mainly leave bmx7 and pianod as main concerns. I think the
former used to work with cyassl
at some point in time and the latter should work with gnutls. Both of
which we have, so it might just
be a minor change to the packaging Makefiles.
So from my point of view dropping libpolarssl now (with a bit of upfront
notice to the maintainers)
makes more sense than trying to drop a package later which is a bit of
unexpected and am not sure if
it can be effectively announced in a service release and just delays the
inevitable.
Cheers,
Steven
More information about the openwrt-adm
mailing list