[PATCH 2/5] lib: sbi: Introduce sbi_hart_protection_reconfigure() function

[Anup Patel]

On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 4:30 PM Rahul Pathak
<rahul.pathak at oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 1:15 PM Anup Patel <anup.patel at oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Instead of assuming that hart protection reconfiguration is unconfigure
> > followed by configure, introduce a separate sbi_hart_protection_reconfigure()
> > function and use it in switch_to_next_domain_context().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel at oss.qualcomm.com>
> > ---
> >  include/sbi/sbi_hart_protection.h |  7 +++++++
> >  lib/sbi/sbi_domain_context.c      |  3 +--
> >  lib/sbi/sbi_hart_protection.c     | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > +int sbi_hart_protection_configure(struct sbi_scratch *scratch)
> > +{
> > +       return __hart_protection_configure(scratch, sbi_hart_protection_best());
> > +}
> > +
> > +void sbi_hart_protection_unconfigure(struct sbi_scratch *scratch)
> > +{
> > +       __hart_protection_unconfigure(scratch, sbi_hart_protection_best());
> > +}
> > +
> > +int sbi_hart_protection_reconfigure(struct sbi_scratch *scratch)
> > +{
> > +       struct sbi_hart_protection *hprot = sbi_hart_protection_best();
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       __hart_protection_unconfigure(scratch, hprot);
> > +       ret = __hart_protection_configure(scratch, hprot);
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               return ret;
> Simply -  return  __hart_protection_configure(scratch, hprot);
>

Okay, I will update.

Regards,
Anup