[PATCH 5/8] lib: sbi_irqchip: Support irqchip device targetting subset of harts
Anup Patel
anup at brainfault.org
Tue Feb 10 08:09:30 PST 2026
On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 1:55 AM Raymond Mao <raymondmaoca at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Anup,
>
> On 2026-02-07 5:25 a.m., anup.patel at oss.qualcomm.com (Anup Patel) wrote:
> > It is possible to have platform where an irqchip device targets
> > a subset of harts and there are multiple irqchip devices to cover
> > all harts.
> >
> > To support this scenario:
> > 1) Add target_harts hartmask to struct sbi_irqchip_device which
> > represents the set of harts targetted by the irqchip device
> > 2) Call warm_init() and irq_handle() callbacks of an irqchip device
> > on a hart only if irqchip device targets that particular hart
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel at oss.qualcomm.com>
> > ---
> > include/sbi/sbi_irqchip.h | 8 +++++--
> > lib/sbi/sbi_irqchip.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > lib/utils/irqchip/aplic.c | 12 +++++++++-
> > lib/utils/irqchip/imsic.c | 7 ++++--
> > lib/utils/irqchip/plic.c | 5 ++--
> > 5 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/sbi/sbi_irqchip.h b/include/sbi/sbi_irqchip.h
> > index cda1e50f..c3ded271 100644
> > --- a/include/sbi/sbi_irqchip.h
> > +++ b/include/sbi/sbi_irqchip.h
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> > #ifndef __SBI_IRQCHIP_H__
> > #define __SBI_IRQCHIP_H__
> >
> > +#include <sbi/sbi_hartmask.h>
> > #include <sbi/sbi_list.h>
> > #include <sbi/sbi_types.h>
> >
> > @@ -20,11 +21,14 @@ struct sbi_irqchip_device {
> > /** Node in the list of irqchip devices */
> > struct sbi_dlist node;
> >
> > + /** Set of harts targetted by this irqchip */
> > + struct sbi_hartmask target_harts;
> > +
> > /** Initialize per-hart state for the current hart */
> > int (*warm_init)(struct sbi_irqchip_device *chip);
> >
> > /** Process hardware interrupts from this irqchip */
> > - int (*process_hwirqs)(void);
> > + int (*process_hwirqs)(struct sbi_irqchip_device *chip);
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -38,7 +42,7 @@ struct sbi_irqchip_device {
> > int sbi_irqchip_process(void);
> >
> > /** Register an irqchip device to receive callbacks */
> > -void sbi_irqchip_add_device(struct sbi_irqchip_device *chip);
> > +int sbi_irqchip_add_device(struct sbi_irqchip_device *chip);
> >
> > /** Initialize interrupt controllers */
> > int sbi_irqchip_init(struct sbi_scratch *scratch, bool cold_boot);
> > diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_irqchip.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_irqchip.c
> > index 3b970527..77ec05af 100644
> > --- a/lib/sbi/sbi_irqchip.c
> > +++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_irqchip.c
> > @@ -13,24 +13,44 @@
> >
> > static SBI_LIST_HEAD(irqchip_list);
> >
> > -static int default_irqfn(void)
> > +int sbi_irqchip_process(void)
> > {
> > - return SBI_ENODEV;
> > -}
> > + struct sbi_irqchip_device *chip;
> > + int rc = SBI_ENODEV;
> >
> > -static int (*ext_irqfn)(void) = default_irqfn;
> > + sbi_list_for_each_entry(chip, &irqchip_list, node) {
> > + if (!chip->process_hwirqs)
> > + continue;
> > + if (!sbi_hartmask_test_hartindex(current_hartindex(), &chip->target_harts))
> > + continue;
> > + rc = chip->process_hwirqs(chip);
> > + if (rc)
> > + break;
> > + }
> >
> > -int sbi_irqchip_process(void)
> > -{
> > - return ext_irqfn();
> > + return rc;
> > }
> >
> > -void sbi_irqchip_add_device(struct sbi_irqchip_device *chip)
> > +int sbi_irqchip_add_device(struct sbi_irqchip_device *chip)
> > {
> > - sbi_list_add_tail(&chip->node, &irqchip_list);
> > + struct sbi_irqchip_device *c;
> > + struct sbi_hartmask hm;
> > +
> > + if (!chip || !sbi_hartmask_weight(&chip->target_harts))
> > + return SBI_EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (chip->process_hwirqs) {
> > + sbi_list_for_each_entry(c, &irqchip_list, node) {
> > + if (!c->process_hwirqs)
> > + continue;
> > + sbi_hartmask_and(&hm, &c->target_harts, &chip->target_harts);
> > + if (sbi_hartmask_weight(&hm))
> > + return SBI_EINVAL;
>
> I tested this by registering a 'process_hwirqs' hook, but
> 'sbi_hartmask_weight' returns errors.
This loop ensures that irqchips which directly connect
to external interrupt line of harts (aka irqchips which
implement process_hwirqs) don't have overlapping
target_harts.
Regards,
Anup
More information about the opensbi
mailing list