[PATCH v2 1/2] lib: sbi: introduce abstraction for wired interrupt handling

Anup Patel anup at brainfault.org
Sat Feb 7 02:10:21 PST 2026


On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 8:32 PM Raymond Mao <raymondmaoca at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Raymond Mao <raymond.mao at riscstar.com>
>
> Add wired interrupt handling abstraction into irqchip.
> This introduces a small provider interface based on
> claim/complete/mask/unmak semantics, allowing to register a wired
> interrupt controller as a provider.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raymond Mao <raymond.mao at riscstar.com>
> ---
>  include/sbi/sbi_irqchip.h | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/sbi/sbi_irqchip.h b/include/sbi/sbi_irqchip.h
> index e0ae12f5..27b88765 100644
> --- a/include/sbi/sbi_irqchip.h
> +++ b/include/sbi/sbi_irqchip.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,38 @@ struct sbi_irqchip_device {
>         int (*irq_handle)(void);
>  };
>
> +/* Handler for a specified hwirq */
> +typedef int (*sbi_irqchip_irq_handler_t)(void *priv);
> +
> +/* Provider operations */
> +struct sbi_irqchip_provider_ops {
> +       /*
> +        * Claim a pending wired interrupt on current hart.
> +        * Returns:
> +        *   SBI_OK      : *hwirq is valid
> +        *   SBI_ENOENT  : no pending wired interrupt
> +        *   <0          : error
> +        */
> +       int (*claim)(void *ctx, u32 *hwirq);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Complete/acknowledge a previously claimed wired interrupt
> +        * (if required by HW).
> +        * Some HW may not require an explicit completion.
> +        */
> +       void (*complete)(void *ctx, u32 hwirq);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * mask/unmask a wired interrupt line.
> +        *
> +        * These are required for reliable couriering of level-triggered device
> +        * interrupts to S-mode: mask in M-mode before enqueueing, and unmask
> +        * after S-mode has cleared the device interrupt source.
> +        */
> +       void (*mask)(void *ctx, u32 hwirq);
> +       void (*unmask)(void *ctx, u32 hwirq);
> +};
> +
>  /**
>   * Process external interrupts
>   *
> @@ -46,4 +78,24 @@ int sbi_irqchip_init(struct sbi_scratch *scratch, bool cold_boot);
>  /** Exit interrupt controllers */
>  void sbi_irqchip_exit(struct sbi_scratch *scratch);
>
> +/*
> + * Register the active wired interrupt provider.
> + * - max_hwirq specifies the highest valid hwirq ID.
> + */
> +int sbi_irqchip_register_provider(const struct sbi_irqchip_provider_ops *ops,
> +                                 void *ctx, u32 max_hwirq);
> +
> +u32 sbi_irqchip_get_max_src(void);
> +
> +/* Set/clear handler for a specified hwirq */
> +int sbi_irqchip_set_handler(u32 hwirq, sbi_irqchip_irq_handler_t handler,
> +                           void *priv);
> +int sbi_irqchip_clear_handler(u32 hwirq);
> +
> +void sbi_irqchip_mask_irq(u32 hwirq);
> +void sbi_irqchip_unmask_irq(u32 hwirq);
> +
> +/* external interrupt handler (irqchip device hook) */
> +int sbi_irqchip_handle_external_irq(void);
> +

I did not mean renaming and moving stuff to sbi_irqchip.h
instead, my expectation was to use struct sbi_irqchip_device
as the abstraction for the interrupt controller.

Regards,
Anup



More information about the opensbi mailing list