[PATCH 1/3] maple_tree: introduce mas_prealloc_calc()

[Sidhartha Kumar]

On 10/9/23 3:25 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Sidhartha,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
> 
> [auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
> [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.6-rc5 next-20231009]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sidhartha-Kumar/maple_tree-introduce-mas_prealloc_calc/20231010-041859
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231009201639.920512-2-sidhartha.kumar%40oracle.com
> patch subject: [PATCH 1/3] maple_tree: introduce mas_prealloc_calc()
> config: m68k-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231010/202310100603.qsn3ruBx-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231010/202310100603.qsn3ruBx-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310100603.qsn3ruBx-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>>> lib/maple_tree.c:5428:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'mas_prealloc_calc' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>      5428 | int mas_prealloc_calc(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas)
>           |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> 
> vim +/mas_prealloc_calc +5428 lib/maple_tree.c
> 
>    5420	
>    5421	/**
>    5422	 * mas_prealloc_calc() - Calculate number of nodes needed for a
>    5423	 * store operation.
>    5424	 * @wr_mas: The maple write state
>    5425	 *
>    5426	 * Return: Number of nodes required for preallocation.
>    5427	 */
>> 5428	int mas_prealloc_calc(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas)

Adding static inline should fix this compilation error.

>    5429	{
>    5430		struct ma_state *mas = wr_mas->mas;
>    5431		unsigned char node_size;
>    5432	
>    5433		if (unlikely(!mas->index && mas->last == ULONG_MAX))
>    5434			return 1;
>    5435	
>    5436		/* Root expand */
>    5437		if (unlikely(mas_is_none(mas) || mas_is_ptr(mas)))
>    5438			return 1;
>    5439	
>    5440		if (unlikely(!mas_wr_walk(wr_mas))) {
>    5441			/* Spanning store, use worst case for now */
>    5442			return 1 + mas_mt_height(mas) * 3;
>    5443		}
>    5444	
>    5445		/* At this point, we are at the leaf node that needs to be altered. */
>    5446		/* Exact fit, no nodes needed. */
>    5447		if (wr_mas->r_min == mas->index && wr_mas->r_max == mas->last)
>    5448			return 0;
>    5449	
>    5450		mas_wr_end_piv(wr_mas);
>    5451		node_size = mas_wr_new_end(wr_mas);
>    5452		if (node_size >= mt_slots[wr_mas->type]) {
>    5453			/* Split, worst case for now. */
>    5454			return 1 + mas_mt_height(mas) * 2;
>    5455		}
>    5456	
>    5457		/* New root needs a singe node */
>    5458		if (unlikely(mte_is_root(mas->node)))
>    5459			return 1;
>    5460	
>    5461		/* Potential spanning rebalance collapsing a node, use worst-case */
>    5462		if (node_size  - 1 <= mt_min_slots[wr_mas->type])
>    5463			return mas_mt_height(mas) * 2 - 1;
>    5464	
>    5465		/* node store, slot store needs one node */
>    5466		return 1;
>    5467	}
>    5468	
>