[PATCH v3] pinctrl: Pass all configs to driver on pin_config_set()
Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Tue Aug 27 04:56:31 EDT 2013
Hi Sherman,
Thank you for the patch.
On Sunday 25 August 2013 19:41:39 Sherman Yin wrote:
> When setting pin configuration in the pinctrl framework, pin_config_set() or
> pin_config_group_set() is called in a loop to set one configuration at a
> time for the specified pin or group.
>
> This patch 1) removes the loop and 2) changes the API to pass the whole pin
> config array to the driver. It is now up to the driver to loop through the
> configs. This allows the driver to potentially combine configs and reduce
> the number of writes to pin config registers.
>
> All c files changed have been build-tested to verify the change compiles and
> that the corresponding .o is successfully generated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sherman Yin <syin at broadcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christian Daudt <csd at broadcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Porter <matt.porter at linaro.org>
>
> drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.c | 42 ++++----
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra.c | 69 ++++++------
> include/linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h | 6 +-
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
>
> On Tegra (Tegra114 Dalmore board, on top of next-20130816),
> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
>
> ---
> Please refer to the discussion with Linus W. "[PATCH] ARM: Adds pin config
> API to set all configs in one function" here:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-May/166567.html
>
> All c files changed have been build-tested to verify the change compiles and
> that the corresponding .o are successfully generated.
>
> [v2] rebased on LinusW's linux-pinctrl.git "devel" branch. Fixed and
> build-tested pinctrl-sunxi.c
> [v3] rebased on linux-pinctrl.git:devel as of 2013.08.25. Applied API
> change to new driver pinctrl-palmas.c. Re build-tested all files.
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-mvebu.c | 26 +++--
> drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.c | 42 ++++----
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-abx500.c | 187 ++++++++++++++++--------------
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 48 +++++----
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-bcm2835.c | 43 ++++----
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c | 113 +++++++++++---------
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-falcon.c | 63 ++++++-----
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-imx.c | 28 ++---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mxs.c | 91 ++++++++--------
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-nomadik.c | 125 ++++++++++++----------
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-palmas.c | 134 ++++++++++++-----------
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 57 ++++++----
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c | 17 ++-
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 33 ++++--
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c | 11 +-
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 77 +++++++-------
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra.c | 69 ++++++------
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-tz1090-pdc.c | 135 ++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-tz1090.c | 140 +++++++++++++-----------
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-u300.c | 18 ++--
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-xway.c | 119 +++++++++++++--------
> drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c | 42 ++++----
> drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c | 54 +++++-----
> include/linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h | 6 +-
> 24 files changed, 952 insertions(+), 726 deletions(-)
[snip]
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c index 8649ec3..ced199e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c
> @@ -529,38 +529,44 @@ static int sh_pfc_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev
> *pctldev, unsigned _pin, }
>
> static int sh_pfc_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned _pin,
> - unsigned long config)
> + unsigned long *configs, unsigned num_configs)
> {
> struct sh_pfc_pinctrl *pmx = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> struct sh_pfc *pfc = pmx->pfc;
> - enum pin_config_param param = pinconf_to_config_param(config);
> + enum pin_config_param param;
> unsigned long flags;
> + int i;
Could you please make this an unsigned int ?
Other than that the sh-pfc part looks good to me.
> - if (!sh_pfc_pinconf_validate(pfc, _pin, param))
> - return -ENOTSUPP;
> + for (i = 0; i < num_configs; i++) {
> + param = pinconf_to_config_param(configs[i]);
>
> - switch (param) {
> - case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
> - case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
> - case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
> - if (!pfc->info->ops || !pfc->info->ops->set_bias)
> + if (!sh_pfc_pinconf_validate(pfc, _pin, param))
> return -ENOTSUPP;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&pfc->lock, flags);
> - pfc->info->ops->set_bias(pfc, _pin, param);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pfc->lock, flags);
> + switch (param) {
> + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
> + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
> + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
> + if (!pfc->info->ops || !pfc->info->ops->set_bias)
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
>
> - break;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pfc->lock, flags);
> + pfc->info->ops->set_bias(pfc, _pin, param);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pfc->lock, flags);
>
> - default:
> - return -ENOTSUPP;
> - }
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> + }
> + } /* for each config */
>
> return 0;
> }
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
More information about the linux-rpi-kernel
mailing list