[PATCH V5 03/11] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Add inv_icm42607 Core Driver

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Sat,  9 May 2026 14:18:57 -0500
Chris Morgan <macroalpha82 at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Chris Morgan <macromorgan at hotmail.com>
> 
> Add the core component of a new inv_icm42607 driver. This includes
> a few setup functions and the full register definition in the
> header file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Morgan <macromorgan at hotmail.com>
Hi Chris

The sashiko bot has taken a look and had some comments
and one in this patch is valid.

https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260509191907.24734-1-macroalpha82%40gmail.com

It's minor though so if everything else looks good I might
just tweak whilst applying.


> ---
>  drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607.h   | 332 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607_core.c  | 210 +++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 542 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607_core.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607.h b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..10dcd3473e9c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607.h
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42607/inv_icm42607_core.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e84e84416dab
> --- /dev/null
> +/**
> + *  inv_icm42607_setup() - check and setup chip
> + *  @st:	driver internal state
> + *  @bus_setup:	callback for setting up bus specific registers
> + *
> + *  Returns 0 on success, a negative error code otherwise.
> + */
> +static int inv_icm42607_setup(struct inv_icm42607_state *st,
> +			      inv_icm42607_bus_setup bus_setup)
> +{
> +	const struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(st->map);
> +	unsigned int val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_read(st->map, INV_ICM42607_REG_WHOAMI, &val);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (val != st->hw->whoami)
> +		dev_warn_probe(dev, -ENODEV,
> +			       "invalid whoami %#02x expected %#02x (%s)\n",
> +			       val, st->hw->whoami, st->hw->name);
Sashiko correctly called this out as a bit nonsensical.
dev_warn_probe() is useful for dealing with deferral or that can't happen
with allowing a return dev_warn_probe() type call.

In this particular case it brings us nothing over dev_warn() so better
to just use that.

> +
> +	ret = regmap_write(st->map, INV_ICM42607_REG_SIGNAL_PATH_RESET,
> +			   INV_ICM42607_SIGNAL_PATH_RESET_SOFT_RESET);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;