[PATCH v11 03/22] drm: Add new general DRM property "color format"

[Nicolas Frattaroli]

On Wednesday, 25 March 2026 14:05:25 Central European Standard Time Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 12:49:19PM +0000, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_connector.h b/include/drm/drm_connector.h
> > > index af8b92d2d5b7..bd549f912b76 100644
> > > --- a/include/drm/drm_connector.h
> > > +++ b/include/drm/drm_connector.h
> > > @@ -571,14 +571,102 @@ enum drm_colorspace {
> > >   *   YCbCr 4:2:2 output format (ie. with horizontal subsampling)
> > >   * @DRM_OUTPUT_COLOR_FORMAT_YCBCR420:
> > >   *   YCbCr 4:2:0 output format (ie. with horizontal and vertical subsampling)
> > > + * @DRM_OUTPUT_COLOR_FORMAT_COUNT:
> > > + *   Number of valid output color format values in this enum
> > >   */
> > >  enum drm_output_color_format {
> > >         DRM_OUTPUT_COLOR_FORMAT_RGB444 = 0,
> > >         DRM_OUTPUT_COLOR_FORMAT_YCBCR444,
> > >         DRM_OUTPUT_COLOR_FORMAT_YCBCR422,
> > >         DRM_OUTPUT_COLOR_FORMAT_YCBCR420,
> > > +       DRM_OUTPUT_COLOR_FORMAT_COUNT,
> > >  };
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * enum drm_connector_color_format - Connector Color Format Request
> > > + *
> > > + * This enum, unlike &enum drm_output_color_format, is used to specify requests
> > > + * for a specific color format on a connector through the DRM "color format"
> > > + * property. The difference is that it has an "AUTO" value to specify that
> > > + * no specific choice has been made.
> > > + */
> > > +enum drm_connector_color_format {
> > > +       /**
> > > +        * @DRM_CONNECTOR_COLOR_FORMAT_AUTO: The driver or display protocol
> > > +        * helpers should pick a suitable color format. All implementations of a
> > > +        * specific display protocol must behave the same way with "AUTO", but
> > > +        * different display protocols do not necessarily have the same "AUTO"
> > > +        * semantics.
> > > +        *
> > > +        * For HDMI, "AUTO" picks RGB, but falls back to YCbCr 4:2:0 if the
> > > +        * bandwidth required for full-scale RGB is not available, or the mode
> > > +        * is YCbCr 4:2:0-only, as long as the mode and output both support
> > > +        * YCbCr 4:2:0.
> > 
> > Is there a reason you propose dropping back to YCbCr 4:2:0 without
> > trying YCbCr 4:2:2 first? Minimising the subsampling is surely
> > beneficial, and vc4 for one can do 4:2:2 but not 4:2:0.
> 
> The "auto" behaviour is strictly identical to the one we have right now,
> and this one stems from i915. Back when all that logic was added, it was
> decided to align every driver behavior on i915 because that's what most
> compositors would expect.

Hi Maxime,

would it be okay to extend the behavior while we're at it? 4:2:2 does save
bandwidth compared to RGB (unlike YCbCr 4:4:4). I do think 4:2:2 instead of
4:2:0 will provide benefits in some cases. I assume hardware that supports
4:2:2 only instead of 4:2:0 does so in order to save >= 1 horizontal
row of local SRAM buffer in the display controller for any downscaling,
as it'll only need to consider neighbouring pixels on the same row.

Kind regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli

> 
> Maxime
>