[PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add HUSB311 Type-C controller on RK3576 EVB1

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 18/03/2026 09:30, Alexey Charkov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 12:19 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 18/03/2026 09:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 10:08:02PM +0400, Alexey Charkov wrote:
>>>> Rockchip RK3576 EVB1 board has a Hynetek HUSB311 USB Type-C controller on
>>>> its Type-C OTG port, which also supports DisplayPort Alternate Mode.
>>>>
>>>> Add the required DT nodes to enable basic HUSB311 operation.
>>>>
>>>> Note that for full support of mode and orientation switching, the USBDP
>>>> PHY schema may need to be expanded, such as in [1]. This is left out for
>>>> now until the respective schema is finalized and merged.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20260313-rockchip-usbdp-cleanup-v3-1-3e8fe89a35b5@collabora.com/
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Charkov <alchark at flipper.net>
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3576-evb1-v10.dts | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> DTS patch must not be in this patchset. Don't mix it.
>>
>> In case I am too vague: by don't mix it, I mean - separate DTS changes
>> to independent patchset. They cannot be combined into USB posting.
> 
> Thanks Krzysztof. I will split them out in the next submission. I
> think it's important to first agree on the use of fallback compatibles
> and the best way to handle the (already queued up in next) ET7304
> patches this cycle before their bindings hit mainline. Then, I can
> rebase and squash/split everything as required.

These are independent problems. But if you want to connect them, then
here you have:
If I review the patch, Greg will take everything, defeating the purpose
of my comment. So as you can see, I should rather not review them to
achieve one of my goals.

Best regards,
Krzysztof