[PATCH 15/61] trace: Prefer IS_ERR_OR_NULL over manual NULL check
Steven Rostedt
rostedt at goodmis.org
Wed Mar 11 07:03:32 PDT 2026
On Wed, 11 Mar 2026 14:13:32 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat at kernel.org> wrote:
> Hmm, now IS_ERR_OR_NULL() is an inline function, so it is safe.
> But if you want to use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() here, it will be better something like
>
> node = rhashtable_walk_next(&iter);
> while (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(node)) {
> fprobe_remove_node_in_module(mod, node, &alist);
> node = rhashtable_walk_next(&iter);
> }
But now you need to have a duplicate code in order to acquire "node"
I think the patch just makes the code worse.
-- Steve
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list