[PATCH 14/61] seq_file: Prefer IS_ERR_OR_NULL over manual NULL check

[Philipp Hahn]

Prefer using IS_ERR_OR_NULL() over using IS_ERR() and a manual NULL
check.

Change generated with coccinelle.

To: Alexander Viro <viro at zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner at kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack at suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel at vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Philipp Hahn <phahn-oss at avm.de>
---
 fs/seq_file.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/seq_file.c b/fs/seq_file.c
index 4745db2a34d12b1084cb059a667c367f4fb56dad..da30cbd6485ca8eff6c2572eab10659c694387d2 100644
--- a/fs/seq_file.c
+++ b/fs/seq_file.c
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ ssize_t seq_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
 	p = m->op->start(m, &m->index);
 	while (1) {
 		err = PTR_ERR(p);
-		if (!p || IS_ERR(p))	// EOF or an error
+		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(p))	// EOF or an error
 			break;
 		err = m->op->show(m, p);
 		if (err < 0)		// hard error
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ ssize_t seq_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
 					    m->op->next);
 			m->index++;
 		}
-		if (!p || IS_ERR(p))	// no next record for us
+		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(p))	// no next record for us
 			break;
 		if (m->count >= iov_iter_count(iter))
 			break;

-- 
2.43.0